Login / Signup

An Empirical Comparison of Meta- and Mega-Analysis With Data From the ENIGMA Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Working Group.

Premika S. W. BoedhoeMartijn W. HeymansLianne SchmaalYoshinari AbePino AlonsoStephanie H. AmeisAlan AnticevicPaul D. ArnoldMarcelo C. BatistuzzoFrancesco BenedettiJan Carl BeuckeIrene BollettiniAnushree BoseSilvia BremAnna CalvoRosa CalvoYuqi ChengKang Ik Kevin ChoValentina CiulloSara DallaspeziaDamiaan DenysJamie D. FeusnerKate Dimond FitzgeraldJean-Paul FoucheEgill A. FridgeirssonPatricia GrunerGregory L. HannaDerrek P. HibarMarcelo Queiroz HoexterHao HuChaim HuyserNeda JahanshadAnthony JamesNorbert KathmannChristian KaufmannKathrin KochJun Soo KwonLuisa LazaroChristine LochnerRachel MarshIgnacio Martínez-ZalacaínDavid Mataix-ColsJosé M. MenchónLuciano MinuzziAstrid MorerTakashi NakamaeTomohiro NakaoJanardhanan C. NarayanaswamySeiji NishidaErika L. NurmiJoseph O'NeillJohn PiacentiniFabrizio PirasFederica PirasY. C. Janardhan ReddyTim Jonas ReessYuki SakaiJoão R. SatoH. Blair SimpsonNoam SoreniCarles Soriano-MasGianfranco SpallettaMichael C. StevensPhilip R. SzeszkoDavid F. TolinGuido A. van WingenGanesan VenkatasubramanianSusanne WalitzaZhen WangJe-Yeon YunENIGMA-OCD Working-GroupPaul M. ThompsonDan J. SteinOdile A. van den HeuvelJos W. R. Twisk
Published in: Frontiers Neuroinformatics (2018)
Keyphrases
  • data analysis
  • statistical analysis
  • working group
  • data collection
  • data sets
  • raw data
  • data sources
  • database
  • information technology
  • data points
  • knowledge discovery
  • data quality