Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication.
Lutz BornmannIrina NastHans-Dieter DanielPublished in: Scientometrics (2008)
Keyphrases
- content analysis
- literature review
- computer supported collaborative learning
- video content analysis
- collaborative learning
- knowledge construction
- qualitative analysis
- collaborative knowledge building
- qualitative and quantitative
- digital libraries
- discussion forums
- online discussion
- interaction patterns
- machine learning
- online communities
- quantitative and qualitative
- social media