Alexander Tekles

Publication Activity (10 Years)

Years Active: 2019-2023
Publications (10 Years): 21

Top Topics

Recent Progress

Papers Published

Top Venues

Quant. Sci. Stud.

J. Informetrics

Publications

Anton Gruber, Alexander Tekles, Lutz Bornmann
John Mearsheimer's academic roots: a reference publication year spectroscopy of a political scientist's oeuvre. Scientometrics 128 (7) (2023)
Lutz Bornmann, Christian Ganser, Alexander Tekles
Simulation of the h index use at university departments within the bibliometrics-based heuristics framework: Can the indicator be used to compare individual researchers? J. Informetrics 16 (1) (2022)
Lutz Bornmann, Alexander Tekles
Convergent validity of several indicators measuring disruptiveness with milestone assignments to physics papers by experts. J. Informetrics 15 (3) (2021)
Felix Bittmann, Alexander Tekles, Lutz Bornmann
Applied usage and performance of statistical matching in bibliometrics: The comparison of milestone and regular papers with multiple measurements of disruptiveness as an empirical example. Quant. Sci. Stud. 2 (4) (2021)
Lutz Bornmann, Sitaram Devarakonda, Alexander Tekles, George Chacko
Disruptive papers published in Scientometrics: meaningful results by using an improved variant of the disruption index originally proposed by Wu, Wang, and Evans (2019). Scientometrics 123 (2) (2020)
Alexander Tekles, Lutz Bornmann
Author name disambiguation of bibliometric data: A comparison of several unsupervised approaches. Quant. Sci. Stud. 1 (4) (2020)
Lutz Bornmann, Christian Ganser, Alexander Tekles, Loet Leydesdorff
-index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? The introduction of agent-based simulations into scientometrics. Quant. Sci. Stud. 1 (1) (2020)
Lutz Bornmann, Sitaram Devarakonda, Alexander Tekles, George Chacko
Are disruption index indicators convergently valid? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers. Quant. Sci. Stud. 1 (3) (2020)
Anna Beer, Daniyal Kazempour, Julian Busch, Alexander Tekles, Thomas Seidl
Grace - Limiting the Number of Grid Cells for Clustering High-Dimensional Data. LWDA (2020)
Lutz Bornmann, Alexander Tekles
Convergent validity of several indicators measuring disruptiveness with milestone assignments to physics papers by experts. CoRR (2020)
Lutz Bornmann, Alexander Tekles, Loet Leydesdorff
The convergent validity of several (field-normalized) bibliometric indicators: How well does I3 perform for impact measurement? CoRR (2019)
Lutz Bornmann, Alexander Tekles, Loet Leydesdorff
The convergent validity of several (field-normalized) bibliometric indicators: How well does I3 perform for impact measurement? ISSI (2019)
Lutz Bornmann, Christian Ganser, Alexander Tekles, Loet Leydesdorff
index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. CoRR (2019)
Alexander Tekles, Lutz Bornmann
Author name disambiguation of bibliometric data: A comparison of several unsupervised approaches. CoRR (2019)
Lutz Bornmann, Alexander Tekles
Productivity does not equal usefulness. Scientometrics 118 (2) (2019)
Lutz Bornmann, Sitaram Devarakonda, Alexander Tekles, George Chacko
Do disruption index indicators measure what they propose to measure? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers. CoRR (2019)
Alexander Tekles, Lutz Bornmann
Author name disambiguation of bibliometric data: A comparison of several unsupervised approaches. ISSI (2019)
Lutz Bornmann, Alexander Tekles, Loet Leydesdorff
How well does I3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators? The convergent validity of several (field-normalized) indicators. Scientometrics 119 (2) (2019)
Lutz Bornmann, Alexander Tekles, Helena H. Zhang, Fred Y. Ye
Do we measure novelty when we analyze unusual combinations of cited references? A validation study of bibliometric novelty indicators based on F1000Prime data. CoRR (2019)
Lutz Bornmann, Alexander Tekles
Disruptive papers published in Scientometrics. Scientometrics 120 (1) (2019)
Lutz Bornmann, Alexander Tekles, Helena H. Zhang, Fred Y. Ye
Do we measure novelty when we analyze unusual combinations of cited references? A validation study of bibliometric novelty indicators based on F1000Prime data. J. Informetrics 13 (4) (2019)